Relative responsibility vs. absolute sustainability?
There are no sustainable companies in the world, although there are some which plan to be (Interface, Seventh Generation and Elopak).
There are no true sustainability indexes out there, though there are many that sound as if they might be (DJSI, Newsweek’s Green Rankings, Corporate Knights’ Global 100 Most Sustainable Companies).
The business of corporate sustainability is currently one of relative responsibility, not absolute sustainability. Incremental progress and out performance of peers is often mistakenly celebrated as being in some way sustainable. It may be less unsustainable, but it is not sustainable.
Sustainability is an absolute concept. It has a binary success factor at its heart – something is either sustainable or it is not. This success factor is derived from an understanding of the operating context for business, which in turn is derived from the physical conditions on the planet which give rise to life, weather, resources and everything else.
Responsibility is a relative concept, it derives from social norms and expectations. To be responsible an individual or organisation has to pay attention to the general behavior of peers, partners and competitors and to act relative to that.
Yet mapping one concept to the other is not impossible. An organisation, could for example, consider that has a responsibility to be absolutely sustainable…
Keep it simple
Words can get in the way of the meaning. At their heart, corporate sustainability and corporate responsibility actually mean the same things to most people; the balancing of environmental, social and economic priorities over the long term.
In turn, both CSR and corporate sustainability management activities are simple, they should:
- Focus upon core business,
- Address fundamental business dependencies (e.g. resources, energy, a capable workforce and capable customers),
- Apply performance targets to the company as a whole.
- Be capable of verification by independent third parties.
The key thing then is not the words used to describe the management of these three priorities but the ambition and intent that drives action. Where does your company want to get to and how does it plan to get there?
Longevity means paying attention
Just as any species unable to notice or adapt to changing conditions is likely to die out, companies which are unable to pay attention, interpret and respond to a changing operating environment are unlikely to last for long.
A contextually aware company
Sustainability is really about the same thing, paying attention to context. This is very familiar to most companies. Expensive management consultants make money through selling new and brightly coloured models for interpreting and navigating an organisation’s competitive environment. Sustainability is no different, it’s just that the scope is bigger.
Get to the point, what is a sustainable corporation?
A sustainable corporation is an organisation that determines its behaviour through a detailed understanding of the environmental and social context in which it operates, works within the understood limitations of that system to reflect the demand and requirements of society, and ensures that its impact upon environment and society is either neutral or positive.
DISCOVER MORE | Sustainable Business Strategy
WEF Global Risks 2023 – What’s new and what’s changed?
While big picture environmental threats of climate change, nature loss and ecosystem collapse remain long term risks, geopolitical instability and the current cost-of-living crisis challenges present emerging challenges to the chance for global consensus and coordinated action.
The WEF (World …
2023 sustainable business trends and challenges – what to watch out for
From avoiding greenwashing to facing soaring business costs, 2023 is set to be a challenging year for most business leaders to navigate.
Regulators, customers and consumers have increasing expectations for good quality, consistent information on sustainability. Communication must be accurate and …
Global Risks 2022
Most major sustainability issues have important risk dimensions for companies – and societies. In many cases these are still not adequately represented in board-level discussion, company risk assessments or registers.
WEF’s Global Risk Report provides a very useful, comprehensive global review and …
Biodiversity – the next crisis?
While we’ve been concerned with action on climate and tied up with Covid19, a larger, related crisis is brewing. Businesses are waking up to the need for action on biodiversity.
Biodiversity is one of many issues organisations should consider when developing (or reviewing) sustainable business …
Transforming the business case for sustainability
In a business context it’s often been necessary to justify why sustainability is important with a business case. While it gets less visibility now, it’s still common to see the symptoms of not having a good business case, or one that’s not widely implemented.
Materiality is the difference between a weak sustainability approach and one that’s logical, planned and based upon what’s important. What matters most?
The business case for sustainability – can we make money?
Many people are driven by purpose, the ethical dimension of sustainable business. But all businesses need to make money, we explore where value can be found in sustainable business.
Cost or value? Why is sustainability strategically undervalued?
The business case for sustainability is (shockingly) still either not recognised strategically (i.e. it is understood as an additive factor for operational efficiency or marketing/PR but not as a strategic value creation/destruction factor), or in many cases it is little understood at all.
Leave a Reply